<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/</link>
	<description>Mass Transit&#039;s editor, Leah Harnack, speaks weekly on critical issues facing the public transportation industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schuyler</title>
		<link>http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>Schuyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>Some years ago, while painting the house and listening to the radio, there was a news story about how a train had hit a car at a crossing. It was spun as &quot;the big bad train hit the poor defenseless car at this crossing it had every right to be on.&quot;  Truly annoyed, I went in the house, called the station, and because it was Sunday, I got the actual news reader on the phone.  I explained to him how he had the story completely backwards, and, since I knew the crossing involved, that the driver had to have driven around the gates to be on the tracks at all, and how long it takes a train to stop.  Everyone reading this knows the story.  But to my amazement, the next reading of the news carried a completly different take on what had happened, blaming the car for interfering with the passage of the train.  Yes, they DO care to get the news correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some years ago, while painting the house and listening to the radio, there was a news story about how a train had hit a car at a crossing. It was spun as &#8220;the big bad train hit the poor defenseless car at this crossing it had every right to be on.&#8221;  Truly annoyed, I went in the house, called the station, and because it was Sunday, I got the actual news reader on the phone.  I explained to him how he had the story completely backwards, and, since I knew the crossing involved, that the driver had to have driven around the gates to be on the tracks at all, and how long it takes a train to stop.  Everyone reading this knows the story.  But to my amazement, the next reading of the news carried a completly different take on what had happened, blaming the car for interfering with the passage of the train.  Yes, they DO care to get the news correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Shaw</title>
		<link>http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>Fred, this is a very good post - I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  I&#039;ll never forget the WMATA Metrorail accident at Woodley Park Zoo.  The first article stated that the trains bumped into each other.  So, imagine my surprise when I saw the photographs of the accident.  Quite a bump, indeed!

It just goes to show how important correct word choices are in whatever you are writing, whether it is a news article, a blog, or a formal report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, this is a very good post &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  I&#8217;ll never forget the WMATA Metrorail accident at Woodley Park Zoo.  The first article stated that the trains bumped into each other.  So, imagine my surprise when I saw the photographs of the accident.  Quite a bump, indeed!</p>
<p>It just goes to show how important correct word choices are in whatever you are writing, whether it is a news article, a blog, or a formal report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloan Auchincloss</title>
		<link>http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloan Auchincloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3145</guid>
		<description>Good point, Fred.  I&#039;ve noticed that reporters use &quot;conductor&quot; and &quot;engineer&quot; interchangeably.  Mass transit leadership could build some &quot;bridges&quot; with the press, especially small outlets which do not have transportation speccialists, by providing fact sheets that contain proper definitions.  

Responsible mediaâ€”even blogsâ€” really do want to &quot;get it right.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Fred.  I&#8217;ve noticed that reporters use &#8220;conductor&#8221; and &#8220;engineer&#8221; interchangeably.  Mass transit leadership could build some &#8220;bridges&#8221; with the press, especially small outlets which do not have transportation speccialists, by providing fact sheets that contain proper definitions.  </p>
<p>Responsible mediaâ€”even blogsâ€” really do want to &#8220;get it right.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Mars</title>
		<link>http://o.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2008/03/28/words/#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>Right on target, Fred.  As one who sends many emails, memos, and letters throughout the day to give instructions, report on operational issues, and seek information I need to do my job, I have had experiences of different recipients of my messages perceiving what I stated or asked much differently than I intended.  Words create a mental picture in the minds of the readers.  We must be careful that our words accurately portray what we really want to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on target, Fred.  As one who sends many emails, memos, and letters throughout the day to give instructions, report on operational issues, and seek information I need to do my job, I have had experiences of different recipients of my messages perceiving what I stated or asked much differently than I intended.  Words create a mental picture in the minds of the readers.  We must be careful that our words accurately portray what we really want to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

